That Bonesetter Woman by Frances Quinn

Book Group Review – Spring 2026

Eleven of us gathered at The Ash Tree to share our thoughts on our Spring 2026 read, That Bonesetter Woman. From the outset, reactions were strikingly mixed, ranging from “awful” to “enjoyable,” with “predictable” and the ever-debatable “feel-good read” (delivered with knowing air quotes) also firmly in the mix. As is often the case, such varied responses made for a lively discussion.

First Impressions and Comparisons

For some, disappointment stemmed from expectations shaped by our previous read, another historical novel, The Art of a Lie by Laura Shepherd-Robinson. Laura’s meticulous research set a high bar, and comparisons were inevitable. The ‘awful’ response to This Bonesetter Woman came from feeling that the book did not align with the literary or historical depth they had hoped for, and this perception influenced their view of the research quality. Frances Quinn's career background, outlined in her author biography, 

A Lighter Reading Experience

Others, however, enjoyed the novel for what it offered: an accessible, fast-paced story that did not demand intense concentration. It was described as an easy, enjoyable read that moved along briskly and provided entertainment without being overly taxing.

Predictability and Themes

A recurring point of discussion was the book’s predictability, with the narrative developments being easy to anticipate as new threads emerged. However, this did not entirely detract from the reading experience. Set in 1750s London, the novel explores the challenges faced by a female bonesetter in a male-dominated medical world. While the prejudice she encounters is unsurprising given the historical context, it is a powerful element of the story. 

The Story and Its Characters

At its heart, the novel follows Durie, a woman who discovers both purpose and satisfaction in treating skeletal injuries. Having learned her skills from her father, a rural bonesetter, she builds a practice in London while navigating social and professional obstacles. Her refusal to compromise her ethics, even in the face of success, was widely admired.

Durie herself was loosely based on the historical bonesetter Sarah Mapp, also known as “Crazy Sally”, which was one of the most warmly received aspects of the book. Portrayed as physically ungainly and unapologetically indifferent to social expectations, she won our respect for her confidence, skill, and integrity. Despite working without the benefit of modern medical tools and education, her intuitive, hands-on approach resonated with many of us; several members remarked that they would happily trust her with their own ailments.

Other characters prompted more divided opinions:

• Lucinda was widely dismissed as frivolous and lacking substance – a “silly cow”. 
• Aunt Ellen sparked debate: was she manipulative or simply protective? The consensus leaned toward the latter, though perhaps with a tendency toward overprotection and occasional misjudgement. Her entrepreneurial spirit and desire for her nieces’ independence were seen positively. 
• Durie’s father divided opinion, with some viewing him as chauvinistic while others saw him as a man trying to accommodate his new wife. 
• Malachy was broadly disliked, though his role in the story felt unsurprising. 
• The doctors were criticised for their lack of ethics, in stark contrast to Durie’s principled approach. 
• George, on the other hand, was universally regarded as a true gentleman. 

Would we recommend this book?

Despite the range of opinions, the group reached a strong consensus: “YES” - while it may not satisfy those seeking rigorous historical depth, it succeeds as an engaging and uplifting read. Many of us agreed we would be open to reading more from Frances Quinn in the future.

Our next read is: Whale Fall by Elizabeth O’Connor. We look forward to meeting again on Thursday, 14th May at 8pm, once more at The Ash Tree, for more stimulating discussion.